Method for controlling position of a linear mems mirror with variable resolution and/or light intensity

ABSTRACT

The method for controlling an angular position of a MEMS mirror, includes: applying a first driving moment to the MEMS mirror to generate a rotational scanning movement of the mirror; and, at a zooming instant, applying a second driving moment to the MEMS mirror, wherein the second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra moment. The extra moment may be a DC offset. After a transient period of time from zooming instant, a third driving moment M 2 =k{dot over (θ)} 2 t is applied. The first and third driving moment are variable linearly with time. The driving moments are applied to torsional springs of the mirror.

BACKGROUND Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to a MEMS device including a linear mirror with variable resolution and/or light intensity.

Description of the Related Art

As is known, MEMS devices are increasingly used in a variety of applications, by virtue of their reduced dimensions and low costs. For example, so-called MEMS micro-mirrors are used, i.a., in imaging applications. Pico-projectors have been disclosed including a MEMS micro-mirror configured to receive an optical beam and to vary the direction thereof. Typically, the direction of propagation of the optical beam is varied in a periodic or quasi-periodic way so as to carry out a scan of a portion of space with the reflected optical beam.

Actuation of the MEMS micro-mirrors may be controlled in a linear or in a resonant way. Linear MEMS mirrors (or V-MEMS mirrors), unlike resonance MEMS mirrors, can operate at frequencies far below the natural resonance frequency of the mirror and even at DC. Driving technology for linear MEMS mirrors may be of electrostatic, magnetic, thermal or piezoelectric type.

Linear MEMS mirrors may be of a single axis (1D) type or of a dual axis (2D) type. In the latter case (dual axis MEMS mirrors), actuation around the two axes may be of a same linear or resonant type or may be of different type (resonant actuation for a first, fast scan axis, generally an horizontal axis, and quasi-static linear actuation for a second, slow scanning axis, generally a vertical axis.

For example, FIG. 1 shows an example of an 3-D imaging system for gesture recognition using structured light 3-D detection and including a pico-projector 1 and a micro-camera 2.

The pico-projector 1 accommodates a MEMS mirror so as to emit a light beam M scanning a 3D object 3, here represented schematically, along two scanning directions, e.g. angles Θ and α. The pico-projector 1 and the camera 2 are not in line with the object 3 so that perspective shift (parallax) is occurred. The light beam may be visible, invisible or in any useful frequency range.

For example, the pico-projector 1 projects parallel strips 4 that are detected by the camera 2. The “deformation” of the detected light beam from straight lines is processed for detecting the third dimension information (the missing depth).

Other imaging systems may include a pico-projector integrated in electronic devices, in particular portable or mobile devices, for optical operations, for example for directing light radiation beams generated by a light source, e.g. a laser, according to desired scanning patterns.

In general, a MEMS-based pico-projector for imaging systems may have the structure shown in FIG. 2. The pico-projector 10 of FIG. 2 comprises a light source 6, typically a laser beam source, generating a light beam 7 formed of three monochromatic beams, each of a respective base colour. The light beam 7 passes an optical element 8 shown only schematically and is deflected by a micro-mirror 5. The micro-mirror 5 may be a single, two-dimensional element, or two, one-dimensional elements. In FIG. 2, the micro-mirror 5 is of two-dimensional type, controlled so as to rotate around a vertical axis A and a horizontal axis B. The rotation of the micro-mirror 5 around the vertical axis A generates a horizontal fast scan, and the rotation of the micro-mirror 5 around the horizontal axis B generates a vertical slow scan, as shown in FIG. 3. In FIG. 2, after reflection, the light beam 7 is deflected toward a screen 9.

An exemplary and non-limiting implementation of the micro-mirror 5 is shown in FIG. 4. Here the micro-mirror 5 has a purely electrostatic actuation and is made in a chip 17 forming a platform 11. The platform 11 has a reflecting surface (not shown) and is supported by a suspended frame 13 through a first pair of arms 12 (first torsional springs). The first arms 12 extend from opposite sides of the platform 11 and allow twisting of the platform 11 around first rotation axis A. The suspended frame 13 is coupled to a fixed peripheral portion 15 of the chip 17 through a second pair of arms 16 (second torsional springs) that allow twisting of the suspended frame 13, and thus of the platform 11, around second rotation axis B.

In FIG. 4, the first and second arms 12, 16 are coupled to respective actuation groups 18A, 18B of an electrostatic type. Each actuation group 18A, 18B here comprises first electrodes 19 facing respective second electrodes 20. By applying a voltage drop between the first electrodes 19 and the second electrodes 20, attraction/repulsion forces are generated between them, causing a torque (moment) on the springs and rotation of the arms 12, 16 around their respective axes A, B. Thereby, scanning around the horizontal and vertical directions may be controlled.

In some applications, a variation in the resolution and/or light intensity, e.g. an increase, may be desired. In the following, such a variation will also be called “zooming-in” and “zooming-out”. For example, in the pico-projector 1 of FIG. 1, “zooming-in” means increasing the amount of light in some areas of the object 3, also indicated as “areas of interest”, where greater detail is desired.

The differential equation that governs rotation of a micro-mirror when a moment M is applied to torsional springs (such as springs 12, 16 for micro-mirror 5 of FIG. 4) is well known. Hereinbelow, a single scanning direction (e.g. the direction of the strips 4 in FIG. 1 or the horizontal direction in FIG. 3) is considered and θ is the scanning angle (or angular position of the mirror). However, the following discussion may be easily extended to a two-dimensional control. In particular, ignoring losses due to air drag that are usually very low, the differential equation tying the moment M(t) to the scanning angle θ is the linear equation [1] below:

kθ+j{umlaut over (θ)}=M(t)   [1]

where:

k is the spring stiffness

j is the mirror moment of inertia

{umlaut over (θ)} is the second derivative in time of the mirror angle.

One solution to equation [1] above is full linear scan of the “area of interest”. According to this known solution, scanning is uniform in all sections of the scanned area.

This solution has the drawback that refresh is slow due to the full scan. In addition, maximum resolution may be insufficient for some portions of the scanned area.

BRIEF SUMMARY

At least one embodiment of the disclosure is a MEMS device not affected by the above drawbacks. In particular, the MEMS device allows modification of the resolution and/or light intensity in a simple, purely electronic way.

According to the present disclosure, there is provided a method for controlling an angular position of a MEMS mirror. The method includes applying a first driving moment to the MEMS mirror to generate a rotational scanning movement of the mirror; and performing a zooming by applying a second driving moment to the MEMS mirror. The second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra moment.

According to the present disclosure, there is provided a MEMS device that includes a MEMS mirror and a processing unit. The processing unit has a speed controller configured to apply a first driving moment to the MEMS mirror to generate a rotational scanning movement thereof; and apply a second driving moment to the MEMS mirror at a zooming instant. The second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra moment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

For the understanding of the present disclosure, preferred embodiments are now described, purely as a non-limitative example, with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a 3-D imaging system for gesture recognition using structured light 3-D detection;

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a pico-projector for image scanning;

FIG. 3 shows the projection plot of an image generated by pico-projector on a screen;

FIG. 4 is a top plan view of a MEMS micro-mirror with electrostatic actuation;

FIG. 5 illustrates an ideal plot of the scanning angle during zooming in;

FIG. 6 illustrates a undesired plot of the scanning angle during zooming in;

FIG. 7 shows an enlarged portion of a desired scanning angle plot during variation of the scanning speed; and

FIG. 8 show a schematic diagram of an electric apparatus using the present method.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present description refers to a MEMS mirror which is controlled in a linear way, operating a far lower frequency than the natural resonance frequency of the MEMS structure (e.g., one tenth). For example, if the natural resonance frequency is about 700 Hz, the MEMS mirror may be driven at about 60 Hz.

The present MEMS mirror is controlled so as to have different scanning speeds in different scanning areas, wherein the expression “scanning speed” means a first derivative of the angular position or scanning angle of the MEMS mirror. For example, in case an apparatus including the MEMS mirror is intended to control the power of front head lights in the automotive field, it may change light intensity in different projection areas. In fact, controlling the movement of the MEMS mirror to have closer scanning lines allows a more powerful lighting; whereas the higher the velocity of the MEMS mirror, the lower the obtainable power. Or, in case the device is a pico-projector for image processing, controlling the scanning speed may allow an increased resolution in an “area of interest” comprised in a broader scanning area. This may be obtained by slowing the scanning speed in this area, thus trading speed and resolution in the different areas based on the needs.

FIG. 5 shows an exemplary control of the scanning angle θ of a MEMS mirror using the above solution.

Here, the plot of the scanning angle θ versus time has three straight portions: a first portion 50 with higher slope, a second portion 51 with lower slope, and a third portion 52 with again higher slope (e.g., the same as in the first portion 50), corresponding for example (in an imaging application) to a lower resolution in the area scanned in first portion 50, higher resolution in the area scanned in second portion 51 and again lower resolution in the area scanned in third portion 52.

While operating in a linear scanning mode, however, it is difficult to immediately switch from the higher slope in the first portion 50 to the lower slope of second portion 51 without activating a resonance frequency of the mirror. In fact, if the change of slope is made in zero time, the result shown in FIG. 6 would be obtained.

According to an embodiment, to avoid the resonant behavior of FIG. 6, the scanning speed is modified by introducing a DC (i.e., fixed) offset in the driving.

Hereinbelow, we will demonstrate that, by applying an offset moment to the MEMS mirror, the latter, after a transient, is able to reach a stable condition and to rotate at different constant speed (thus the scanning angle θ moves on another straight line with different slope.

To this end, consider the complete second order equation governing the motion of a linear mirror:

kθ+2ζ√{square root over (jk)}{dot over (θ)}+j{umlaut over (θ)}=M   [2]

wherein:

θ is the mirror angle (which is a function of time t);

k is the spring stiffness constant;

ζ is the damping ratio, as explained below;

j is the inertial angular mass of the mirror; and

M is the applied moment (also a function of time t).

In equation [2] the left side describes the mirror behavior and the right side describes the exciting or driving moment.

The central part of the left side of equation [2], 2ζ√{square root over (jk)}{dot over (θ)}, are the losses. The losses are usually very small compared to the other two parts of the left side of equation [2] and in most cases can be neglected. This term however explains why, applying a constant moment, after a long period of time the excited mirror subsides to a constant value.

In fact, from equation [2] we have that, when a constant moment is applied ({dot over (θ)}={umlaut over (θ)}=0), after a transition time, the position of the mirror becomes:

$\begin{matrix} {{{k\; \theta_{c}} = M_{c}}{\theta_{c} = \frac{M_{c}}{k}}} & \lbrack 3\rbrack \end{matrix}$

wherein M_(c) is the applied constant moment and θ_(c) is the (final) angle reached by the MEMS mirror.

Therefore, when an offset moment M_(c) is introduced, the angle, after a transition time, will be θ_(c).

Subtracting equations [2] and [3] we get:

k(θ−θ_(c))+2ζ√{square root over (jk)}{dot over (θ)}+j{umlaut over (θ)}=(M−M _(c))

Since θ_(c) is constant,

d(θ−θ_(c))/dt={dot over (θ)} and

d ²(θ−θ_(c))/dt ²={umlaut over (θ)},

thus:

$\begin{matrix} {{{k\left( {\theta - \theta_{c}} \right)} + {2\zeta \sqrt{jk}\frac{d\left( {\theta - \theta_{c}} \right)}{dt}} + \frac{{jd}^{2}\left( {\theta - \theta_{c}} \right)}{{dt}^{2}}} = \left( {M - M_{c}} \right)} & \lbrack 4\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Equation [4] demonstrate that, by applying an offset to a MEMS mirror, it is possible to obtain a corresponding angular position and a corresponding moment that ensure exactly the same behavior as before application of the offset moment (instant t=0).

Hereinbelow, we will calculate the moment which is to be applied to the MEMS mirror in order to pass from a straight portion to a following portion at a different second slope.

To this end, let's assume that the scanning angle θ of MEMS mirror is along second portion 51 of the curve of FIG. 5 and shall pass to third portion 52 of the same curve (see also FIG. 7, “zooming out” condition).

Let's consider again equation [1]:

kθ+j{umlaut over (θ)}=M(t)   [1]

Since second portion 51 is straight, the corresponding scanning speed is constant, e.g. equal to {dot over (θ)}₁.

In addition, the angular position is θ=t{dot over (θ)}₁ and the acceleration is {umlaut over (θ)}=0.

Equation (1) thus becomes:

k{dot over (θ)}₁t=M₁   [5]

Therefore, a linear moment, M₁ with slope equal to k{dot over (θ)}₁, ensures the rotation of a MEMS mirror according to a straight line.

At time instant (zooming instant) t=0, we wish to pass from second portion 51 at (constant) angular speed {dot over (θ)}₁ to third portion 52 at a different (constant) angular speed {dot over (θ)}₂.

For analogy to equation (5), we have:

M₂=k{dot over (θ)}₂t

Let us assume that switching between second portion 51 and third portion 52 of the curve of FIG. 7 occurs at angular position θ_(x), furthermore, we impose that switching occurs at a constant acceleration (deceleration) value {umlaut over (θ)}₀, until reaching speed {dot over (θ)}₂.

By integrating constant acceleration value {umlaut over (θ)}₀, we have:

{dot over (θ)}(t)={umlaut over (θ)}₀ t+C1

Here, at instant t=0, we have {dot over (θ)}(0)={dot over (θ)}₁, thus we obtain:

{dot over (θ)}(t)={umlaut over (θ)}₀ t+{dot over (θ)} ₁   [6]

By integrating equation [6] as a function of t, we get the mirror angle:

${\theta (t)} = {{{\int{{\overset{.}{\theta}(t)}{dt}}} + {C\; 2}} = {{\int{\left( {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}t} + {\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}} \right){dt}}} + {C\; 2}}}$ ${\theta (t)} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{2}\frac{t^{2}}{2}} + {{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + {C\; 2}}$

At instant t=0, as indicated, the angular position of the MEMS mirror is θ_(x), thus C2=θ(0)=θ_(x).

The equation that governs the switching of the mirror movement from the second portion 51 to the third portion 52 is thus:

$\begin{matrix} {{\theta (t)} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\frac{t^{2}}{2}} + {{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + {\theta_{x}.}}} & \lbrack 7\rbrack \end{matrix}$

By replacing equation [7] in the differential equation [1],

k{dot over (θ)}+j{umlaut over (θ)}=M(t)   [1]

we obtain:

${{k\left\lbrack {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\frac{t^{2}}{2}} + {{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + \theta_{x}} \right\rbrack} + {j{\frac{d^{2}}{{dt}^{2}}\left\lbrack {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\frac{t^{2}}{2}} + {{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + \theta_{x}} \right\rbrack}}} = M$ ${{k\left\lbrack {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\frac{t^{2}}{2}} + {{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + \theta_{x}} \right\rbrack} + {j\; {\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}}} = M$ ${{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; {\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}t} + {k\; \theta_{x}}} = M$

Since, according to equation [5], k{dot over (θ)}₁t=M₁, we have:

${{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + M_{1} + {k\; \theta_{x}}} = M$ ${M - M_{1}} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; \theta_{x}}}$

Thus, M−M₁

M₀ is an extra moment to be added at instant t=0 to pass to third portion 52 of the curve of FIG. 7 with constant acceleration:

$\begin{matrix} {{M_{0}(t)} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; \theta_{x}}}} & \lbrack 8\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In equation [8], the right side is known. The length of time (acceleration time t) requested to accelerate from constant speed of {dot over (θ)}₁ to the new constant speed of {dot over (θ)}₂ is:

$\begin{matrix} {t = \frac{{\overset{.}{\theta}}_{2} - {\overset{.}{\theta}}_{1}}{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}}} & \lbrack 9\rbrack \end{matrix}$

After the acceleration time t, analogously to equation [5], the moment is:

M₂=k{dot over (θ)}₂t

Of course, the extra moment to be added may be a negative one, so as to obtain switching from a higher slope to a lower slope, such as from first portion 50 to second portion 51 of FIG. 5.

The conversion from the applied moment M and the controlling quantity (e.g. a voltage drop V for the micro-mirror 5 of FIG. 4, a current in an electromagnetic case or temperature in other actuation systems) is thus non-linear and may depend on the scanning angle θ.

In an embodiment, a non-linear conversion table is used to convert the driving moment M to the quantity used to control the position of the MEMS mirror. For example, FIG. 8 schematically shows an electric apparatus 100 comprising a MEMS mirror 105. Electric apparatus 100 may be, for example, a 3D detection system for gesture recognition. Electric apparatus 100 may also be a portable computer, a laptop, a notebook, a PDA, a tablet, and a smartphone, for optical operations, in particular for directing light radiation beams generated by a light source in desired patterns. In the alternative, electric apparatus 100 may be a lighting apparatus, e.g. for automotive applications. Mirror 105 may be formed as mirror 5 of FIG. 4.

The electric apparatus 100 has a processing unit 110, a table 111 and a driving unit 112. The processing unit 110 include speed control means 115 that calculates the instant moment M according to the above method according to the desired scanning speed. The table 111 and the driving unit 112 are coupled to the processing unit 110. The table 111 has an input 102 and an output 103. The input 102 of table 111 receives the values of the instant moment M and the current angle θ from processing unit 110. The corresponding control voltage value V is read on the table and fed to the driving unit 112 on the output 103. The driving unit 112 generates corresponding driving signals D for the mirror 105, whose actual position e_(s) is fed back to the processing unit 110.

In another embodiment, table 111 is used only to store the steady stable position value θ_(x) (position at equilibrium, when {dot over (θ)}={umlaut over (θ)}=0). In this case, table 111 is considerably simplified.

The advantages of the present disclosure are clear from the above. In particular, it is underlined that the present solution allows obtaining a purely electronic “zoom-in” or “zoom-out” without using any special optics.

No different light sources are needed, but a same light source can achieve more or less brightness on a projected or scanned area.

No mechanical engine is needed to move a projected pattern to different directions.

Finally, it is clear that numerous variations and modifications may be made to the described and illustrated method and device, all falling within the scope of the disclosure.

The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure. 

1. A method for controlling an angular position of a MEMS mirror, comprising: applying a first driving moment to the MEMS mirror, applying the first driving moment generating a rotational scanning movement of the mirror; and performing a zooming by applying a second driving moment to the MEMS mirror, wherein the second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra driving moment.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the extra driving moment is a fixed moment.
 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first driving moment is variable linearly with time.
 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the first and second driving moments are applied to torsional springs of the mirror and the first driving moment is given by the equation: k{dot over (θ)}₁t=M₁ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs, {dot over (θ)} is a first derivative of an angular position of the mirror, and t is time.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first and second driving moments are applied to torsional springs of the mirror and the extra driving moment (M−M₁) is equal to: ${M - M_{1}} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; \theta_{x}}}$ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs, {umlaut over (θ)}₀ is a second derivative of an angular position of the mirror at a zooming instant, j is an inertial angular mass of the mirror, t is time, and θ_(x) is the angular position of the mirror at the zooming instant.
 6. The method according to claim 1, comprising applying a third driving moment M₂=k{dot over (θ)}₂t after a transient period of time t from a zooming instant, wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs, and {dot over (θ)}₂ is a speed of the mirror.
 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein applying the first driving moment comprises rotating the MEMS mirror at a first constant speed {dot over (θ)}₁ and applying the third driving moment comprises rotating the MEMS mirror at the speed {dot over (θ)}₂, which is constant.
 8. The method according to claim 1, comprising: reading from a conversion table a control electrical quantity corresponding to an instant driving moment; and controlling rotation of the MEMS mirror according to the control electrical quantity read from the conversion table.
 9. An optical device comprising: a MEMS mirror including a reflective structure and an actuator configured to apply driving moments to the reflective structure; and a processing unit, the processing unit including a speed controller configured to cause the actuator to apply to the reflective structure a first driving moment that generates a rotational scanning movement of the reflective structure; and the speed controller being configured to cause the actuator to apply a second driving moment to the reflective structure at a zooming instant, wherein the second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra driving moment.
 10. The optical device according to claim 9, wherein the MEMS mirror has torsional springs configured to be controlled by the first and second driving moments, and the first driving moment M₁ is given by the equation: k{dot over (θ)}₁t=M₁ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs and {dot over (θ)} is a first derivative of an angular position of the reflective structure.
 11. The optical device according to claim 10, wherein the actuator is configured to apply the first and second driving moments to the torsional springs of the mirror and the extra moment (M−M₁) is equal to: ${M - M_{1}} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; \theta_{x}}}$ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs, {umlaut over (θ)}₀ is a second derivative of the angular position of the reflective structure at the zooming instant, and θ_(x) is the angular position of the reflective structure at the zooming instant.
 12. The optical device according to claim 9, wherein the speed controller is configured to cause the actuator to apply a third driving moment M₂=k{dot over (θ)}₂t after a transient period of time from the zooming instant.
 13. The optical device according to claim 12, comprising a conversion table having an input coupled to the processing unit, the speed controller being configured to provide to the conversion table one or more signals corresponding to the first, second and third driving moment, and the conversion table being configured to supply a control electrical quantity to the MEMS mirror.
 14. An optical device comprising: a MEMS mirror; and speed control means for applying a first driving moment to the MEMS mirror to generate a rotational scanning movement thereof, and for applying a second driving moment to the MEMS mirror at a zooming instant, wherein the second driving moment is equal to the first driving moment plus an extra driving moment.
 15. The optical device according to claim 14, wherein the MEMS mirror has torsional springs configured to be controlled by the first and second driving moments, and the first driving moment M₁ is given by the equation: k{dot over (θ)}₁t=M₁ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs and {dot over (θ)} is a first derivative of an angular position of the MEMS mirror.
 16. The optical device according to claim 15, wherein the speed control means are for applying the first and second driving moments to the torsional springs of the mirror and the extra moment (M−M₁) is equal to: ${M - M_{1}} = {{{\overset{¨}{\theta}}_{0}\left\lbrack {{k\; \frac{t^{2}}{2}} + j} \right\rbrack} + {k\; \theta_{x}}}$ wherein k is a stiffness constant of the springs, {umlaut over (θ)}₀ is a second derivative of the angular position of the MEMS mirror at the zooming instant, and θ_(x) is the angular position of the MEMS mirror at the zooming instant.
 17. The optical device according to claim 14, wherein the speed controller speed control means are for applying a third driving moment M₂=k{dot over (θ)}₂t after a transient period of time from the zooming instant.
 18. The optical device according to claim 12, wherein the speed control means include a processing unit and a conversion table having an input coupled to the processing unit, the processing unit being configured to provide to the conversion table one or more signals corresponding to the first, second and third driving moment, and the conversion table being configured to supply a control electrical quantity to the MEMS mirror. 